Paleoclimatology (Geology 415X/515X)

Spring 2007

~ Term Paper ~

Important Dates:

Paper topic: Feb. 9
Paper outline: March 9
Paper due for peer review: April 6
Peer reviews due: April 13
Paper submission (final version): April 20

Note:

  1. Papers should be submitted electronically, preferably by email, as pdf files.
  2. Five points will be deducted from the final grade of the paper for each day that the paper is delayed beyond the due dates.

Description:

There is no pre-determined layout for the paper. However, the paper must include a title, a brief abstract, conclusions, and cited references.

Topic:
Your paper should contain a discussion of a paleoclimate question (see examples below). On February 9 you must provide the question that you plan to address in your paper. On March 9 you must provide an outline of the paper. The outline should include the title of the paper, the main topics to be addressed, and a list of at least five references. We will evaluate your outline on the basis of significance and suitability (see below).

Format:
Your paper should contain 10-12 double-spaced, typewritten pages of text (12-point font, 1 inch margins all around). Figures and tables should be added as required to clarify meaning and to add detail (not included in the required page count). Each figure and table should have a caption.

Plagiarism is unacceptable! Consequently, you must document the source of any piece of information that is not yours. If you choose to copy a phrase from a source, you must place it in quotes and cite its source. However, it is recommended that you employ your own words to describe a set of data or to explain a given concept. The source of each assertion that is not yours (including interpretations and point of views) or data must be acknowledged by citing the source within the body of the text. Citations should follow the style of any of the manuscripts that we are going to discuss in class, but you must be consistent.

When writing the paper, keep the following general points in mind:

Grading Criteria

Grading will be based on the following general criteria:

Peer-Reviewing Criteria

  1. Peer reviews should be roughly 1-2 pages.
  2. Peer reviews should be based in part on the Grading Criteria above. Reviews should note, for example, where clarity is lacking or if there appear to be scientific errors. Reviews should also note where the Criteria have been handled well.
  3. Peer reviews should also point out minor issues like incorrect spelling, missing references, figures that are not clear, etc.
  4. Comments should be supported by specific writing from the paper reviewed. That is, saying simply, "The writing was not clear." is not acceptable. A much more substantive statement is, instead, "The writing was not clear because the discussion on page N of the paper could me X or it could mean Y or Z." In other words, give evidence supporting your review comments.
  5. Grading of peer reviews will be based on how well they address each of the peer-reviewing criteria.

Grading Scheme (100 points)

Topic 10 points
Outline 25 points
Peer review 10 points
Final draft 55 points

Examples of Questions